The Ethical Arguments For and Against the Life Saving Procedure

Introduction Ethical principles in health care dictate that caregivers should put patient autonomy into consideration particularly when determining the most appropriate interventions to save life and during end-of-life care (Thomas, 2004, p. 494).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Ethical Arguments For and Against the Life Saving Procedure specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In most cases, advance directives including proxy, instruction, and combined directives play a vital role in terms of facilitating the decisions made by doctors relative to the patient’s wishes and those communicated by a surrogate. On the other hand, the Living Will, Health Care Power of Attorney, and the Advanced Health Care Directive do also serve the same purpose as other forms of advance directives (Pera Van Tonder, 2005). However, caregivers may find themselves in an ethical dilemma in case an incapacitated patient lacks an advan ce directive. This is the case scenario highlighted by Brudney in which the patient’s life partner (the closest family member) notes that the patient would not wish to undergo a high risk life saving procedure because of the perceived heath risks. In this essay, two key questions to the patient’s life partner are listed followed by discussions regarding the ethical arguments for and against the life saving procedure. Subsequently, the essay highlights the most appropriate steps that should be undertaken by the healthcare team in the decision-making process from the patient’s perspective. Key questions Considering that the patient lacks an advance directive, there is the need to ask the patient’s life partner the following questions; Why should your patient consider writing an advance directive, and if your patient decided to appoint you as a health care representative, what would be your responsibilities relative to your patient’s wishes? If your patient was in a position to make specific decisions while you still stand in as the health care representative, would your patient allow other family members to participate in decision-making? Arguments for and against the lifesaving procedure The fact that the autonomy of patients and their family members should be respected in any decision-making process before administering any medical intervention cannot be overstated; however, there is the need to understand that health care is a service that involves trained and specialized professionals whose clinical decisions are based on intellect and conscience (Burke, 2010). Besides, with the recent advancements in technology and information sharing within the health care sector, there is reason to believe that the decisions made by health care professionals are evidence-based. Thus, the perceived health risks raised by the patient’s life partner may not hold before weighing the overall health outcome of the lifesaving procedure against the health risks involved.Advertising Looking for essay on ethics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Conversely, before administering the procedure, it is ethical to obtain an informed consent from the patient’s family members who should be given the opportunity to represent the wishes of the patient accordingly (Pera Van Tonder, 2005). Furthermore, there is no way the caregiver can disregard the issues raised by the patient’s life partner without restoring this person’s confidentiality relative to the benefits and risks associated with the lifesaving procedure. Overall, the caregiver should bring the life partner into perspective of the ethical issues for and against the procedure while factoring in the issues raised by the life partner. The decision-making process from the perspective of the incapacitated patient The absence of an advance directive in this case scenario puts the healthcare team i n an ethical dilemma. However, taking the place of the patient, my hope will be that the healthcare team will invite the contribution of other family members besides the life partner before making the final clinical decision. Here, all parties involved should discuss the benefits, risks, and possible complications of the planned procedure before settling on the most appropriate and ethical decision. Further, I will also hope that the decision-making process will be informed by the principles of ethics in healthcare, evidence-based care processes, and the healthcare rights of conscience, which dictate that the decision-making process should aim to achieve quality care at low costs, positive outcomes, and reduced health complications without contravening the medical malpractice standards (Burke, 2010, p. 471). Conclusions The foregoing discussions highlight the ethical considerations involved in administering high risk lifesaving procedures in the absence of an advance directive from the incapacitated patient. From the discussions, it is certain that the absence of an advance directive can make the decision-making process rather difficult in different clinical cases involving incapacitated patients. However, with a strong moral and ethical foundation that incorporated the principles of evidence-based healthcare, any healthcare team should be able to achieve the expected results that suit all the parties involved. References Burke, D.M. (2010). Healthcare rights of conscience: A survey of federal and state laws.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Ethical Arguments For and Against the Life Saving Procedure specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Americans United for Life. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/41170730/10-Healthcare Pera, S.A. Van Tonder, S. (2005). Ethics in healthcare (2nd ed.). Lansdowne: Juta Co. Ltd. Thomas, E.D., Blume, K.G., Forman, S.J., Appelbaum, F.R. (2004). Tho mas’ hematopoietic cell transplantation (3rd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. This essay on The Ethical Arguments For and Against the Life Saving Procedure was written and submitted by user Kohen Bentley to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

My Sample Sociology Essay Contradicts Two Perspective

My Sample Sociology Essay Contradicts Two PerspectiveIs it really possible to write a sample sociology essay that is both informative and interesting? Can one be innovative, yet still have a tried and true method of writing? Shouldn't a good sample essay always retain the reader's interest and stir their imagination? I'll tell you my own sample of this type.The story of Ivan Drago, a Russian war hero, going to Cambridge University and joining its sociology department, seemed like an intriguing tale to me. A sample essay with my own distinctive version of the story was born.My first attempt at a Sample it was rather different from what many people use. I used the well-known example of Plato and portrayed it as a modern story. This made a lot of sense in terms of the composition of my sample essay. I could write a piece that was sociological in the first instance, but still retained its educational, and literary, value. In my opinion, my readers were more likely to keep returning to th is more contemporary view, even if they did not understand what exactly I was talking about.So, in order to avoid repeating myself, I've modified my Sample it slightly. I've used a very similar narrative to that of I. I think it is much more dramatic and can evoke much more interest in my readers. The good news is that I didn't have to pay any more attention to the comparative method, and could still include what I was after: the human aspect of the story.One characteristic of my Intro to is the importance of a point of view. The reason that I wrote it this way is that in order to get across what I wanted to say, I needed to capture the reader's imagination. A typical example of a sociological essay would be this: 'The author is going to present his opinion on the moral and social values of America, so far as Russia is concerned, and will explain why he thinks that Russia is much better than America'. The idea behind my sample was that the writer would be seen as a scholar, and the facts would reinforce his position.The next characteristic of my sample is is that I keep the reader's attention until the end. I've now included a number of follow-up questions in a small book entitled Postscript. The main purpose of these questions is to see how effective they are in getting the story across.As a result, my research over the last year has led me to believe that the most successful writers don't always use the traditional method of writing an essay, but instead decide to use an editorial technique that includes research and analysis. Another aspect of this study is the value of following up. If the reader is thoroughly engrossed, they will be more likely to continue reading. I hope you find my methods useful.